W3C Technical Plenary and Working Groups meetings
Cannes-Mandelieu, France, March 1-5, 2004
W3C hosts such an event once a year. It allows Working Groups to
hold their face to face meetings, meet participants from other
groups and collect information on outside groups activities during
a Technical Plenary meeting . In march 2004, this event was hosted
in Cannes-Mandelieu (France). Four days were devoted to the various
working groups meetings, and one to the technical plenary meeting.
I attended the Semantic Web Interest Group face to face meeting as well as the Technical Plenary Day.
Semantic Web Interest Group
This face to face meeting was public, and was attended by many
developers new to the community. The problems discussed were:
- Datatyping
- Performance of Semantic Web storage and retrieval
- An XHTML syntax for RDF
- Birth of Data Access Working Group
- Web Services
- RDF and Conceptual Graphs
- Implementation experiences
- Goals for 2004-2006
The 30 applications presented or discussed attest the vitality of the
Semantic Web community. The implementation experiences presented
should help developers to avoid the same problems. Some problems
discussed here are still waiting for a solution:
- Datatyping: semantics of Datatypes are unclear, and no efficient
algorithm for computing Datatype entailment in RDF is known. The
presentations were mainly about extensions of the basic model, which
must still be studied.
- Performance: though promising tests have been presented with
respect to number of triples stored in a database and retrieval of
individual triples, there is still work to be done with respect to
retrieval of a set of triples (the entailed RDF graph). The first
problem is linear, while the second is NP-complete. Hopefully, this
will be discussed in the upcoming Data Access Working
Group.
Technical Plenary
After a Welcome session, the topics covered by the plenary meeting were:
- Architecture of the World Wide Web
- Mixed Markup languages documents
- Making Test Suites Work
- Web Access without PC
- Querying the Web
Discussions between members of different Working Groups cannot be
as constructive as the ones in a Working Group face to face
meeting. It is however of vital importance to have such a quick view
on what is happening in other Working Groups: they can have solutions
to problems closely related to our own.
Feel free to comment to
Jean - Francois . Baget À inrialpes . fr,
$Id: mandelieu.html,v 1.2 2004/12/10 13:19:52 euzenat Exp $